Re: [PATCH v14 12/19] scsi: scsi_debug: Add the preserves_write_order module parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/23 06:54, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Zone write locking is not used for zoned devices if the block driver
> reports that it preserves the order of write commands. Make it easier to
> test not using zone write locking by adding support for setting the
> driver_preserves_write_order flag.
> 
> Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 9c0af50501f9..1ea4925d2c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int dix_reads;
>  static int dif_errors;
>  
>  /* ZBC global data */
> +static bool sdeb_preserves_write_order;
>  static bool sdeb_zbc_in_use;	/* true for host-aware and host-managed disks */
>  static int sdeb_zbc_zone_cap_mb;
>  static int sdeb_zbc_zone_size_mb;
> @@ -5138,9 +5139,13 @@ static struct sdebug_dev_info *find_build_dev_info(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  
>  static int scsi_debug_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdp)
>  {
> +	struct request_queue *q = sdp->request_queue;
> +
>  	if (sdebug_verbose)
>  		pr_info("slave_alloc <%u %u %u %llu>\n",
>  		       sdp->host->host_no, sdp->channel, sdp->id, sdp->lun);
> +	if (sdeb_preserves_write_order)
> +		q->limits.driver_preserves_write_order = true;

Nit: this could simply be:

	q->limits.driver_preserves_write_order = sdeb_preserves_write_order;

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -5755,6 +5760,8 @@ module_param_named(statistics, sdebug_statistics, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>  module_param_named(strict, sdebug_strict, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>  module_param_named(submit_queues, submit_queues, int, S_IRUGO);
>  module_param_named(poll_queues, poll_queues, int, S_IRUGO);
> +module_param_named(preserves_write_order, sdeb_preserves_write_order, bool,
> +		   S_IRUGO);
>  module_param_named(tur_ms_to_ready, sdeb_tur_ms_to_ready, int, S_IRUGO);
>  module_param_named(unmap_alignment, sdebug_unmap_alignment, int, S_IRUGO);
>  module_param_named(unmap_granularity, sdebug_unmap_granularity, int, S_IRUGO);
> @@ -5812,6 +5819,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ndelay, "response delay in nanoseconds (def=0 -> ignore)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_lun_0, "no LU number 0 (def=0 -> have lun 0)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_rwlock, "don't protect user data reads+writes (def=0)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_uld, "stop ULD (e.g. sd driver) attaching (def=0))");
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(preserves_write_order,
> +		 "Whether or not to inform the block layer that this driver preserves the order of WRITE commands (def=0)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_parts, "number of partitions(def=0)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(num_tgts, "number of targets per host to simulate(def=1)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(opt_blks, "optimal transfer length in blocks (def=1024)");

Otherwise, looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux