On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:43:20AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Thank you for having reported this. I'm OK with integrating the > above change in my patch. However, code changes must be > motivated. Do you perhaps have an explanation of why WQ_HIGHPRI > makes the issue disappear that you observed? I think it is clear there are locking bugs in all this, so it is not surprising that changing the scheduling behavior can make locking bugs hide Jason
