On 9/30/23 23:30, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:51:12AM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
On 9/26/23 15:24, Bart Van Assche wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
index 1501120d4f52..6cd5d5a7a316 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *rxe_wq;
int rxe_alloc_wq(void)
{
- rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
+ rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
if (!rxe_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
Thanks,
Bart.
<...>
Nevertheless this is a good hint since it seems to imply that there is a race between the requester and
completer which is certainly possible.
Bob, Bart
Can you please send this change as a formal patch?
As we prefer workqueue with bad performance implementation over tasklets.
Hi Bob,
Do you perhaps have a preference for who posts the formal patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
