On 10/2/23 08:59, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Streamline to use a similar code flow as the other reset functions.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 26 +++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index 21d84940c9cb..81b38f5da3b6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -1581,6 +1581,7 @@ static int scsi_eh_bus_device_reset(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
{
struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *bdr_scmd, *next;
struct scsi_device *sdev;
+ LIST_HEAD(check_list);
enum scsi_disposition rtn;
shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost) {
@@ -1606,27 +1607,22 @@ static int scsi_eh_bus_device_reset(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
"%s: Sending BDR\n", current->comm));
rtn = scsi_try_bus_device_reset(sdev);
- if (rtn == SUCCESS || rtn == FAST_IO_FAIL) {
- if (!scsi_device_online(sdev) ||
- rtn == FAST_IO_FAIL ||
- !scsi_eh_tur(bdr_scmd)) {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, next,
- work_q, eh_entry) {
- if (scmd->device == sdev &&
- scsi_eh_action(scmd, rtn) != FAILED)
- __scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd,
- done_q,
- DID_RESET);
- }
- }
- } else {
+ if (rtn != SUCCESS && rtn != FAST_IO_FAIL)
SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
"%s: BDR failed\n", current->comm));
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, next, work_q, eh_entry) {
+ if (scmd->device != sdev)
+ continue;
+ if (rtn == SUCCESS)
+ list_move_tail(&scmd->eh_entry, &check_list);
+ else if (rtn == FAST_IO_FAIL)
+ __scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, done_q,
+ DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED);
}
}
- return list_empty(work_q);
+ return scsi_eh_test_devices(&check_list, work_q, done_q, 0);
}
I think the description of this patch is too brief. The following
information is missing from the patch description:
- Why the scsi_device_online() and scsi_eh_tur() checks have been left
out.
- Why DID_RESET has been changed into DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED.
- Why the list_move_tail() call has been introduced.
- Why the scsi_eh_test_devices() call has been introduced.
Thanks,
Bart.