Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2023 00:11:39 +0800
Cc: njavali@xxxxxxxxxxx, mrangankar@xxxxxxxxxxx, GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, lduncan@xxxxxxxx, cleech@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <b3a5e717-90ab-42f8-8fe1-4a24fff404c3@oracle.com>

Thanks for the explanation!

I thought the two locks are the same so made this bogus patch,
sorry for the confusion and thanks much for your time.

Regards,
Chengfeng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock
  - From: Chengfeng Ye
- Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock
  - From: Mike Christie

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add SC7280 compatible string
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: fix potential deadlock on frwd/back lock
Next by thread: [PATCH V4 0/4] Add UFS host controller and Phy nodes for sc7280
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux