On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 01:57:00PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Align the binding property for clock such that "clocks" property > comes first followed by "clock-names" property. Why do we care? > > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 16 ++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > index 802640efa956..d17bdc4e934f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > @@ -295,14 +295,6 @@ examples: > <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC &config_noc SLAVE_UFS_MEM_CFG>; > interconnect-names = "ufs-ddr", "cpu-ufs"; > > - clock-names = "core_clk", > - "bus_aggr_clk", > - "iface_clk", > - "core_clk_unipro", > - "ref_clk", > - "tx_lane0_sync_clk", > - "rx_lane0_sync_clk", > - "rx_lane1_sync_clk"; > clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>, > <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>, > <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>, > @@ -311,6 +303,14 @@ examples: > <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>, > <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>, > <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_1_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core_clk", > + "bus_aggr_clk", > + "iface_clk", > + "core_clk_unipro", > + "ref_clk", > + "tx_lane0_sync_clk", > + "rx_lane0_sync_clk", > + "rx_lane1_sync_clk"; > freq-table-hz = <75000000 300000000>, > <0 0>, > <0 0>, > -- > 2.17.1 >
