Re: [PATCH v3 07/23] ata: libata-scsi: Fix delayed scsi_rescan_device() execution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:14:51PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Commit 6aa0365a3c85 ("ata: libata-scsi: Avoid deadlock on rescan after
> device resume") modified ata_scsi_dev_rescan() to check the scsi device
> "is_suspended" power field to ensure that the scsi device associated
> with an ATA device is fully resumed when scsi_rescan_device() is
> executed. However, this fix is problematic as:
> 1) It relies on a PM internal field that should not be used without PM
>    device locking protection.
> 2) The check for is_suspended and the call to scsi_rescan_device() are
>    not atomic and a suspend PM event may be triggered between them,
>    casuing scsi_rescan_device() to be called on a suspended device and
>    in that function blocking while holding the scsi device lock. This
>    would deadlock a following resume operation.
> These problems can trigger PM deadlocks on resume, especially with
> resume operations triggered quickly after or during suspend operations.
> E.g., a simple bash script like:
> 
> for (( i=0; i<10; i++ )); do
> 	echo "+2 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
> 	echo mem > /sys/power/state
> done
> 
> that triggers a resume 2 seconds after starting suspending a system can
> quickly lead to a PM deadlock preventing the system from correctly
> resuming.
> 
> Fix this by replacing the check on is_suspended with a check on the
> return value given by scsi_rescan_device() as that function will fail if
> called against a suspended device. Also make sure rescan tasks already
> scheduled are first cancelled before suspending an ata port.
> 
> Fixes: 6aa0365a3c85 ("ata: libata-scsi: Avoid deadlock on rescan after device resume")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index 0cf0caf77907..0479493e54bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -5172,11 +5172,27 @@ static const unsigned int ata_port_suspend_ehi = ATA_EHI_QUIET
>  
>  static void ata_port_suspend(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t mesg)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * We are about to suspend the port, so we do not care about
> +	 * scsi_rescan_device() calls scheduled by previous resume operations.
> +	 * The next resume will schedule the rescan again. So cancel any rescan
> +	 * that is not done yet.
> +	 */
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ap->scsi_rescan_task);
> +
>  	ata_port_request_pm(ap, mesg, 0, ata_port_suspend_ehi, false);
>  }
>  
>  static void ata_port_suspend_async(struct ata_port *ap, pm_message_t mesg)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * We are about to suspend the port, so we do not care about
> +	 * scsi_rescan_device() calls scheduled by previous resume operations.
> +	 * The next resume will schedule the rescan again. So cancel any rescan
> +	 * that is not done yet.
> +	 */
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ap->scsi_rescan_task);
> +
>  	ata_port_request_pm(ap, mesg, 0, ata_port_suspend_ehi, true);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index ac2d332b4963..6297f8c16a13 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -4760,7 +4760,7 @@ void ata_scsi_dev_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct ata_link *link;
>  	struct ata_device *dev;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	bool delay_rescan = false;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&ap->scsi_scan_mutex);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
> @@ -4769,37 +4769,34 @@ void ata_scsi_dev_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
>  		ata_for_each_dev(dev, link, ENABLED) {
>  			struct scsi_device *sdev = dev->sdev;
>  
> +			/*
> +			 * If the port was suspended before this was scheduled,
> +			 * bail out.
> +			 */
> +			if (ap->pflags & ATA_PFLAG_SUSPENDED)
> +				goto unlock;
> +
>  			if (!sdev)
>  				continue;
>  			if (scsi_device_get(sdev))
>  				continue;
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * If the rescan work was scheduled because of a resume
> -			 * event, the port is already fully resumed, but the
> -			 * SCSI device may not yet be fully resumed. In such
> -			 * case, executing scsi_rescan_device() may cause a
> -			 * deadlock with the PM code on device_lock(). Prevent
> -			 * this by giving up and retrying rescan after a short
> -			 * delay.
> -			 */
> -			delay_rescan = sdev->sdev_gendev.power.is_suspended;
> -			if (delay_rescan) {
> -				scsi_device_put(sdev);
> -				break;
> -			}
> -
>  			spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
> -			scsi_rescan_device(sdev);
> +			ret = scsi_rescan_device(sdev);
>  			scsi_device_put(sdev);
>  			spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
> +
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto unlock;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +unlock:
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
>  	mutex_unlock(&ap->scsi_scan_mutex);
>  
> -	if (delay_rescan)
> +	/* Reschedule with a delay if scsi_rescan_device() returned an error */
> +	if (ret)
>  		schedule_delayed_work(&ap->scsi_rescan_task,
>  				      msecs_to_jiffies(5));
>  }
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxx>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux