Re: [PATCH v11 24/34] scsi: Have scsi-ml retry scsi_report_lun_scan errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 18:15 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> This has scsi_report_lun_scan have scsi-ml retry errors instead of
> driving
> them itself.
> 
> There is one behavior change where we no longer retry when
> scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, but we should be ok. We don't need to
> retry
> for failures like the queue being removed, and for the case where
> there
> are no tags/reqs the block layer waits/retries for us. For possible
> memory
> allocation failures from blk_rq_map_kern we use GFP_NOIO, so retrying
> will probably not help.

Another minor behavior change is that we may now get up to 3 retries
for UAs plus up to 3 retries for non-CC errors. Anyway,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux