Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: do not look for unsupported vdd-hba-max-microamp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: do not look for unsupported vdd-hba-max-microamp
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:05:17 -0400
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230906113302.201888-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> (Krzysztof Kozlowski's message of "Wed, 6 Sep 2023 13:33:02 +0200")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Krzysztof,

> Bindings do not allow vdd-hba-max-microamp property and the driver
> does not use it (does not control load of vdd-hba supply). Skip
> looking for this property to avoid misleading dmesg messages:

Applied to 6.7/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH] scsi: ufs: do not look for unsupported vdd-hba-max-microamp
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] qla2xxx: correct endianness for rqstlen and rsplen
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: ipr: Do PCI error checks on own line
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: do not look for unsupported vdd-hba-max-microamp
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: do not look for unsupported vdd-hba-max-microamp
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]