[PATCH v2 2/3] ufs: core: fix abnormal scale up after last cmd finish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

When ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(Thread A) running and new command
coming, ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(Thread B) may get host_lock
after Thread A first time release host_lock. Then Thread A second time
get host_lock will set clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0 which scale up
clock abnormal next polling_ms time.
Also inlines another __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling calls.

Below is racing step:
1	hba->clk_scaling.suspend_work (Thread A)
	ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work
2		spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
3		hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true;
4		spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
		__ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling
7			spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
8			hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0;
9			spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);

	ufshcd_send_command (Thread B)
		ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy
5			spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
			....
6			spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);

Signed-off-by: Peter Wang <peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 17 ++++-------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index e3672e55efae..057549b0e586 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -275,7 +275,6 @@ static inline void ufshcd_add_delay_before_dme_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static int ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba);
-static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba);
 static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up);
 static irqreturn_t ufshcd_intr(int irq, void *__hba);
 static int ufshcd_change_power_mode(struct ufs_hba *hba,
@@ -1385,9 +1384,10 @@ static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_suspend_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		return;
 	}
 	hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true;
+	hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, irq_flags);
 
-	__ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
+	devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq);
 }
 
 static void ufshcd_clk_scaling_resume_work(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -1564,16 +1564,6 @@ static void ufshcd_devfreq_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	dev_pm_opp_remove(hba->dev, clki->max_freq);
 }
 
-static void __ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq);
-	spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-	hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-}
-
 static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -1586,11 +1576,12 @@ static void ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended) {
 		suspend = true;
 		hba->clk_scaling.is_suspended = true;
+		hba->clk_scaling.window_start_t = 0;
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
 
 	if (suspend)
-		__ufshcd_suspend_clkscaling(hba);
+		devfreq_suspend_device(hba->devfreq);
 }
 
 static void ufshcd_resume_clkscaling(struct ufs_hba *hba)
-- 
2.18.0




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux