Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Align programming sequence as per HW spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Align programming sequence as per HW spec
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 17:44:01 -0400
Cc: mani@xxxxxxxxxx, agross@xxxxxxxxxx, andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, quic_cang@xxxxxxxxxxx, quic_nguyenb@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230823154413.23788-1-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> (Nitin Rawat's message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:14:07 +0530")
Organization: Oracle Corporation

Nitin,

> This patch aligns programming sequence as per Qualcomm UFS hardware
> specification.

Which tree is this against? Doesn't apply to 6.6/scsi-queue...

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Align programming sequence as per HW spec
  - From: Manivannan Sadhasivam

References:
- [PATCH V5 0/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Align programming sequence as per HW spec
  - From: Nitin Rawat

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fnic: Replace sgreset tag with max_tag_id
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -next v2] scsi: Remove raid_component_add()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH V5 6/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Handle unipro clk HW division based on scaling conditions.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] scsi: ufs: qcom: Align programming sequence as per HW spec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]