Re: [PATCH v11 04/16] scsi: core: Introduce a mechanism for reordering requests in the error handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/24/23 16:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 8/23/23 16:22, Damien Le Moal wrote:
The sd driver does have zone append emulation using regular writes. The
emulation relies on zone write locking to avoid issues with adapters that do not have strong ordering guarantees, but that could be adapted to be removed for UFS devices with write ordering guarantees. This solution would greatly simplify your series since zone append requests are not subject to zone write locking at
the block layer. So no changes would be needed at that layer.

However, that implies that your preferred use case (f2fs) must be adapted to use
zone append instead of regular writes. That in itself may be a bigger-ish
change, but in the long run, likely a better one I think as that would be
compatible with NVMe ZNS and also future UFS standards defining a zone append
command.

Hi Damien,

Thanks for the feedback. I agree that it would be great to have zone append
support in F2FS. However, I do not agree that switching from regular writes
to zone append in F2FS would remove the need for sorting SCSI commands by LBA in the SCSI error handler. Even if F2FS would submit zoned writes
then the following mechanisms could still cause reordering of the zoned
write after these have been translated into regular writes:
* The SCSI protocol allows SCSI devices, including UFS devices, to respond
with a unit attention or the SCSI BUSY status at any time. If multiple write commands are pending and some of the pending SCSI writes are not
executed because of a unit attention or because of another reason, this
causes command reordering.

Yes. But the important thing to remember is that with 'zone append' the resulting LBA will be returned on completion, they will _not_ be specified in the submission. So any command reordering doesn't affect the zone append commands as they heven't been written yet.

* Although the link between the UFS controller and the UFS device is pretty
reliable, there is a non-zero chance that a SCSI command is lost. If this
happens the SCSI timeout and error handlers are activated. This can cause
reordering of write commands.

Again, reordering is not an issue with zone append. With zone append you specify in which zone the command should land, and upon completion the LBA where the data is written will be returned.

So if there is an error the command has not been written, consequently there is no LBA to worry about, and you can reorder at will.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux