On 8/14/23 04:26, Adrian Hunter wrote:
And perhaps the following is neater: u32 val; return !read_poll_timeout(ufshcd_readl, val, val & UIC_COMMAND_READY, 500, UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT * 1000, false, hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS);
Would the above make readers of that code wonder whether read_poll_timeout() perhaps returns a boolean? Wouldn't it be better to test the read_poll_timeout() return value as follows? return read_poll_timeout(ufshcd_readl, val, val & UIC_COMMAND_READY, 500, UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT * 1000, false, hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) == 0; Thanks, Bart.