Nit (but preferred) : change "no_target_scan" to "disable_target_scan". Otherwise, patch is good. Christof Schmitt wrote:
I attached a new patch that adds a flag to the fc template. So far, it is untested. What is the better approach? Avoid scanning with the flag being 1 or use the 1 to enable scaning and make this change in all FC drivers?
1 to disable. Avoid changing the drivers...
We had the discussion about zfcp inventing LUNs in the past (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg17125.html).
Yep. However, I don't agree with Hannes in this case. Given that the firmware is already doing funky things to share the real adapter, I believe it (or the driver) should do the right thing in the LUN presentation to keep the system happy. But - I guess that's something for a different time. -- james s - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
