From: Tuo Li <islituo@xxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 0e881c0a4b6146b7e856735226208f48251facd8 ] The variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag is often protected by the lock phba->hbalock() when is accessed. Here is an example in lpfc_unregister_fcf_rescan(): spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.fcf_flag |= FCF_INIT_DISC; spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); However, in the same function, phba->fcf.fcf_flag is assigned with 0 without holding the lock, and thus can cause a data race: phba->fcf.fcf_flag = 0; To fix this possible data race, a lock and unlock pair is added when accessing the variable phba->fcf.fcf_flag. Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230630024748.1035993-1-islituo@xxxxxxxxx Reviewed-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c index 5ba3a9ad95016..9d2feb69cae77 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c @@ -6961,7 +6961,9 @@ lpfc_unregister_fcf_rescan(struct lpfc_hba *phba) if (rc) return; /* Reset HBA FCF states after successful unregister FCF */ + spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.fcf_flag = 0; + spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); phba->fcf.current_rec.flag = 0; /* -- 2.40.1
