Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx, dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx, christian.koenig@xxxxxxx, justin.tee@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:21:57 +0800
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230726181322.26754-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>

Sorry for the interruption, I just notice that the ndlp node
inside timer does not share with that of lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox().

This is a false alarm and sorry again for this.

Best regards,
Chengfeng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
  - From: Chengfeng Ye

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] scsi: lpfc: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io vectors
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &phba->hbalock
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
Next by thread: [PATCH] scsi: fcoe: Fix potential deadlock on &fip->ctlr_lock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux