Re: [PATCH v10 13/33] scsi: rdac: Fix sshdr use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/07/2023 22:33, Mike Christie wrote:
If scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0, it doesn't initialize the sshdr, so we
shouldn't access the sshdr. If it returns 0, then the cmd executed
successfully, so there is no need to check the sshdr. This has us access
the sshdr when get a return value > 0.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie<michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c | 9 +++++++--
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
index c5538645057a..cdefaa9f614e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
@@ -541,6 +541,7 @@ static void send_mode_select(struct work_struct *work)
  	const struct scsi_exec_args exec_args = {
  		.sshdr = &sshdr,
  	};
+	int rc;
spin_lock(&ctlr->ms_lock);
  	list_splice_init(&ctlr->ms_head, &list);
@@ -558,14 +559,18 @@ static void send_mode_select(struct work_struct *work)
  		(char *) h->ctlr->array_name, h->ctlr->index,
  		(retry_cnt == RDAC_RETRY_COUNT) ? "queueing" : "retrying");
- if (scsi_execute_cmd(sdev, cdb, opf, &h->ctlr->mode_select, data_size,
-			     RDAC_TIMEOUT * HZ, RDAC_RETRIES, &exec_args)) {
+	rc = scsi_execute_cmd(sdev, cdb, opf, &h->ctlr->mode_select, data_size,
+			      RDAC_TIMEOUT * HZ, RDAC_RETRIES, &exec_args);
+	if (rc < 0) {
+		err = SCSI_DH_IO;
+	} else if (rc > 0) {
  		err = mode_select_handle_sense(sdev, &sshdr);
  		if (err == SCSI_DH_RETRY && retry_cnt--)
  			goto retry;
  		if (err == SCSI_DH_IMM_RETRY)
  			goto retry;
  	}
+
  	if (err == SCSI_DH_OK) {
As I see, err is initially set to SCSI_DH_OK when declared. Then if we need to retry and 2nd call to scsi_execute_cmd() passes, such that rc == 0, then err still holds the old value. This seems same as pre-existing behaviour - is this proper?

Thanks,
John





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux