Re: [PATCH v8 15/33] scsi: spi: Fix sshdr use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/14/23 4:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/14/23 00:17, Mike Christie wrote:
>> If scsi_execute_cmd returns < 0 it will not have set the sshdr, so we
>> can't access it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c | 6 +++---
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
>> index 2442d4d2e3f3..2100c3adb456 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int spi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const void *cmd,
>>            */
>>           result = scsi_execute_cmd(sdev, cmd, opf, buffer, bufflen,
>>                         DV_TIMEOUT, 1, &exec_args);
>> -        if (result < 0 || !scsi_sense_valid(sshdr) ||
>> +        if (result <= 0 || !scsi_sense_valid(sshdr) ||
>>               sshdr->sense_key != UNIT_ATTENTION)
>>               break;
>>       }
> 
> Hmm ... why is this change necessary?

It's not needed. Will drop.

I think when reviewing sshdr code I thought it was a waste to check for sense
when result was zero. When I broke up the set, it got caught in the sshdr fixes.
Will drop since not related.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux