On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 07:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:21:57AM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> > @@ -2609,13 +2609,13 @@ static void do_cciss_request(request_queue_t *q)
> > } else {
> > c->Request.CDBLen = 16;
> > c->Request.CDB[1]= 0;
> > - c->Request.CDB[2]= (start_blk >> 56) & 0xff; //MSB
> > - c->Request.CDB[3]= (start_blk >> 48) & 0xff;
> > - c->Request.CDB[4]= (start_blk >> 40) & 0xff;
> > - c->Request.CDB[5]= (start_blk >> 32) & 0xff;
> > - c->Request.CDB[6]= (start_blk >> 24) & 0xff;
> > - c->Request.CDB[7]= (start_blk >> 16) & 0xff;
> > - c->Request.CDB[8]= (start_blk >> 8) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[2]= ((u64)start_blk >> 56) & 0xff; //MSB
> > + c->Request.CDB[3]= ((u64)start_blk >> 48) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[4]= ((u64)start_blk >> 40) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[5]= ((u64)start_blk >> 32) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[6]= ((u64)start_blk >> 24) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[7]= ((u64)start_blk >> 16) & 0xff;
> > + c->Request.CDB[8]= ((u64)start_blk >> 8) & 0xff;
>
> put_unaligned(cpu_to_be64(start_blk), &c->Request.CDB[2]);
>
> which is what's happening here anyway.
Well ... this was debated a while ago ad nauseam:
http://marc.info/?t=117699555300010
The main objection to what you propose is that it forces the u64
coercion even in the 32 bit start_blk case. The preferred solution as a
result of that debate was simply to us a macro Andrew introduced:
upper_32_bits()
Which will silently replace zero in the non LBD case. I actually
thought this had already been done.
James
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
