On 6/1/23 15:50, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently, ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock() is only called by
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() with the addition of a spinlock wrapper
for ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_nolock(). Combining these two functions
into one would result in cleaner code.
For future patches, please use the imperative mood for the patch
description ("would result in" -> "results in"). Additionally, a
follow-up patch that renames ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe_lock() into
ufshcd_mcq_poll_cqe() would be welcome. Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
