Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: simplify scsi_stop_queue()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/7/23 08:38, Martin Wilck wrote:
On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 07:05 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 6/7/23 02:26, Martin Wilck wrote:
On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 07:27 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:38:45PM +0200, mwilck@xxxxxxxx wrote:
   scsi_target_block(struct device *dev)
   {
+       struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(dev);
+
          if (scsi_is_target_device(dev))
                  starget_for_each_device(to_scsi_target(dev),
NULL,
                                          device_block);
          else
                  device_for_each_child(dev, NULL,
target_block);
+
+       /* Wait for ongoing scsi_queue_rq() calls to finish. */
+       if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!shost))

How could host ever be NULL here?  I can't see why we'd want this
check.

The reason is simple: I wasn't certain if dev_to_shost() could
return
NULL, and preferred skipping the wait over an Oops. I hear you say
that
dev_to_shost() can't go wrong, so I'll remove the NULL test.

I propose to pass shost as the first argument to scsi_target_block()
instead of using dev_to_shost() inside scsi_target_block(). Except in
__iscsi_block_session(), shost is already available as a local
variable.

If we do this, it might actually be cleaner to just pass the tag set to
wait for.

Wouldn't that be close to a layering violation? Shouldn't SCSI APIs accept
pointers to SCSI objects instead of pointers to block layer abstractions?

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux