Re: [PATCH] block: improve ioprio value validity checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:30:18PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:09 AM Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The fix that Damien suggested, which adds multiple boundary checks in the
> > IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE() macro will fix any user space program that uses the uapi
> > header.
> 
> Fixing things in the UAPI headers make it easier to do things right
> going forward with classes and all.

Hello Linus,

Thank you for providing your input!

Considering that you seem to be in favor of fixing things in the UAPI
headers (i.e. the patch in $subject).

Could you possibly consider sending a proper A-b or R-b tag?


Kind regards,
Niklas




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux