Re: dpt_i2o fixes for stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:42:00PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I'm proposing to address the most obvious issues with dpt_i2o on stable
> branches.  At this stage it may be better to remove it as has been done
> upstream, but I'd rather limit the regression for anyone still using
> the hardware.
> 
> The changes are:
> 
> - "scsi: dpt_i2o: Remove broken pass-through ioctl (I2OUSERCMD)",
>   which closes security flaws including CVE-2023-2007.
> - "scsi: dpt_i2o: Do not process completions with invalid addresses",
>   which removes the remaining bus_to_virt() call and may slightly
>   improve handling of misbehaving hardware.
> 
> These changes have been compiled on all the relevant stable branches,
> but I don't have hardware to test on.

Why don't we just delete it in the stable trees as well?  If no one has
the hardware (otherwise the driver would not have been removed), who is
going to hit these issues anyway?

thanks,

greg k-h



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux