On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:25:20PM -0700, Justin Tee wrote: > no_of_objects may be hardcoded to 1 right now, but does it make more > sense to use? > > struct_size(rap, obj, be32_to_cpu(rap->no_of_objects)); Oh yeah, that's nicer. :) > We probably should have declared no_of_objects as __be32 to have > avoided this confusion. Perhaps this patch can add that too? -- Kees Cook
