On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 14:34 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > Some callers of scsi_execute_cmd() (like e.g. sd_spinup_disk()) are > passing an uninitialized struct sshdr and don't look at the return > value of scsi_execute_cmd() before looking at the contents of that > struct. > > This can result in false positives when looking for specific error > conditions. > > In order to fix that let scsi_execute_cmd() zero sshdr- > >response_code, > resulting in scsi_sense_valid() returning false. > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fixes: 3949e2f04262 ("scsi: simplify scsi_execute_req_flags") > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > --- > I'm not aware of any real error having happened due to this problem, > but I thought it should be fixed anyway. > I _think_ 3949e2f04262 was introducing the problem, but I'm not 100% > sure it is really the commit to be blamed. > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) One nitpick below, otherwise it looks good to me. > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > index b7c569a42aa4..923336620bff 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > @@ -209,11 +209,17 @@ int scsi_execute_cmd(struct scsi_device *sdev, > const unsigned char *cmd, > struct scsi_cmnd *scmd; > int ret; > > - if (!args) > + if (!args) { > args = &default_args; > - else if (WARN_ON_ONCE(args->sense && > - args->sense_len != > SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE)) > - return -EINVAL; > + } else { > + /* Mark sense data to be invalid. */ > + if (args->sshdr) > + args->sshdr->response_code = 0; We know for certain that sizeof(*sshdr) is 8 bytes, and will most probably remain so. Thus memset(sshdr, 0, sizeof(*sshdr)) would result in more efficient code. Martin