Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ses: Handle enclosure with just a primary component gracefully

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/4/5 5:41, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, James Bottomley wrote:

This reverts 3fe97ff3d9493 ("scsi: ses: Don't attach if enclosure has
no components") and introduces proper handling of case where there
are no detected secondary components, but primary component
(enumerated in num_enclosures) does exist. That fix was originally
proposed by Ding Hui <dinghui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

I think everything in here looks fine except this:

--- a/drivers/scsi/ses.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
@@ -509,9 +509,6 @@ static int ses_enclosure_find_by_addr(struct
enclosure_device *edev,
         int i;
         struct ses_component *scomp;
-       if (!edev->component[0].scratch)
-               return 0;
-
         for (i = 0; i < edev->components; i++) {
                 scomp = edev->component[i].scratch;
                 if (scomp->addr != efd->addr)

If you remove the check, then scomp could be NULL here and we'll oops
on scomp->addr.

This hunk was taken from the original 2020 fix, but you are right, thanks
for spotting this.


I think we should remove the check, because the edev->components
represented the effectiveness of array pointers, so we need check
edev->components firstly instead of checking edev->component[0].scratch.

If edev->components is 0, we won't enter the for loop, so don't worry about dereference scomp.

Please find v2 below, with this hunk removed, and Tested-by: added.





From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ses: Handle enclosure with just a primary component gracefully

This reverts 3fe97ff3d9493 ("scsi: ses: Don't attach if enclosure has no
components") and introduces proper handling of case where there are no detected
secondary components, but primary component (enumerated in num_enclosures)
does exist. That fix was originally proposed by Ding Hui <dinghui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

Completely ignoring devices that have one primary enclosure and no secondary one
results in ses_intf_add() bailing completely

	scsi 2:0:0:254: enclosure has no enumerated components
         scsi 2:0:0:254: Failed to bind enclosure -12ven in valid configurations such

even on valid configurations with 1 primary and 0 secondary enclosures as below:

	# sg_ses /dev/sg0
	  3PARdata  SES               3321
	Supported diagnostic pages:
	  Supported Diagnostic Pages [sdp] [0x0]
	  Configuration (SES) [cf] [0x1]
	  Short Enclosure Status (SES) [ses] [0x8]
	# sg_ses -p cf /dev/sg0
	  3PARdata  SES               3321
	Configuration diagnostic page:
	  number of secondary subenclosures: 0
	  generation code: 0x0
	  enclosure descriptor list
	    Subenclosure identifier: 0 [primary]
	      relative ES process id: 0, number of ES processes: 1
	      number of type descriptor headers: 1
	      enclosure logical identifier (hex): 20000002ac02068d
	      enclosure vendor: 3PARdata  product: VV                rev: 3321
	  type descriptor header and text list
	    Element type: Unspecified, subenclosure id: 0
	      number of possible elements: 1

The changelog for the original fix follows

=====
We can get a crash when disconnecting the iSCSI session,
the call trace like this:

   [ffff00002a00fb70] kfree at ffff00000830e224
   [ffff00002a00fba0] ses_intf_remove at ffff000001f200e4
   [ffff00002a00fbd0] device_del at ffff0000086b6a98
   [ffff00002a00fc50] device_unregister at ffff0000086b6d58
   [ffff00002a00fc70] __scsi_remove_device at ffff00000870608c
   [ffff00002a00fca0] scsi_remove_device at ffff000008706134
   [ffff00002a00fcc0] __scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087062e4
   [ffff00002a00fd10] scsi_remove_target at ffff0000087064c0
   [ffff00002a00fd70] __iscsi_unbind_session at ffff000001c872c4
   [ffff00002a00fdb0] process_one_work at ffff00000810f35c
   [ffff00002a00fe00] worker_thread at ffff00000810f648
   [ffff00002a00fe70] kthread at ffff000008116e98

In ses_intf_add, components count could be 0, and kcalloc 0 size scomp,
but not saved in edev->component[i].scratch

In this situation, edev->component[0].scratch is an invalid pointer,
when kfree it in ses_intf_remove_enclosure, a crash like above would happen
The call trace also could be other random cases when kfree cannot catch
the invalid pointer

We should not use edev->component[] array when the components count is 0
We also need check index when use edev->component[] array in
ses_enclosure_data_process
=====

Reported-by: Michal Kolar <mich.k@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Michal Kolar <mich.k@xxxxxxxxx>
Originally-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 3fe97ff3d9493 ("scsi: ses: Don't attach if enclosure has no components")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
---

v1 -> v2:

	- fix potential oops in ses_enclosure_find_by_addr() spotted by
	  James
	- add Tested-by:

  drivers/scsi/ses.c | 17 ++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ses.c b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
index b11a9162e73a..f3fa92f493ec 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ses.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ses.c
@@ -602,8 +602,10 @@ static void ses_enclosure_data_process(struct enclosure_device *edev,
  						components++,
  						type_ptr[0],
  						name);
-				else
+				else if (components < edev->components)
  					ecomp = &edev->component[components++];
+				else
+					ecomp = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (!IS_ERR(ecomp)) {
  					if (addl_desc_ptr) {
@@ -734,11 +736,6 @@ static int ses_intf_add(struct device *cdev,
  			components += type_ptr[1];
  	}
- if (components == 0) {
-		sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev, "enclosure has no enumerated components\n");
-		goto err_free;
-	}
-
  	ses_dev->page1 = buf;
  	ses_dev->page1_len = len;
  	buf = NULL;
@@ -780,9 +777,11 @@ static int ses_intf_add(struct device *cdev,
  		buf = NULL;
  	}
  page2_not_supported:
-	scomp = kcalloc(components, sizeof(struct ses_component), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!scomp)
-		goto err_free;
+	if (components > 0) {
+		scomp = kcalloc(components, sizeof(struct ses_component), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!scomp)
+			goto err_free;
+	}
edev = enclosure_register(cdev->parent, dev_name(&sdev->sdev_gendev),
  				  components, &ses_enclosure_callbacks);

--
Thanks,
-dinghui




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux