Re: [PATCH v5 09/19] scsi: allow enabling and disabling command duration limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/5/23 04:28, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> index 4994148e685b..9a54b2c0fee7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
>> @@ -1222,6 +1222,36 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(queue_ramp_up_period, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>>  		   sdev_show_queue_ramp_up_period,
>>  		   sdev_store_queue_ramp_up_period);
>>  
>> +static ssize_t sdev_show_cdl_enable(struct device *dev,
>> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (int)sdev->cdl_enable);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t sdev_store_cdl_enable(struct device *dev,
>> +				     struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +				     const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	bool v;
>> +
>> +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> +		return -EACCES;
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN seems be too restrictive. NCQ PRIO (ncq_prio_enable) does not 
> require CAP_SYS_ADMIN. Since NCQ PRIO and CDL are mutually exclusive a user
> should be able to toggle both features.

Indeed, we can have CDL be the same as NCQ prio. We can remove this
SYS_CAP_ADMIN check.





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux