Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: libsas: Simplify sas_check_parent_topology()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/4/2 13:00, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 4/1/23 17:15, Jason Yan wrote:
Factor out a new helper sas_check_phy_topology() to simplify
sas_check_parent_topology(). And centralize the calling of
sas_print_parent_topology_bug().

Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index c0841652f0e0..bffcccdbda6b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -1238,11 +1238,59 @@ static int sas_check_eeds(struct domain_device *child,
  	return res;
  }
-/* Here we spill over 80 columns. It is intentional.
- */
-static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child)
+
+static int sas_check_phy_topology(struct domain_device *child, struct ex_phy *parent_phy)

Long line. Break after the first argument.

The max line warning in checkpatch has been changed to 100[1]. But 80 is
still preferred. So you are right, I will fix it.

[1] bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate 80-column warning")


  {
  	struct expander_device *child_ex = &child->ex_dev;
+	struct ex_phy *child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id];
+	struct expander_device *parent_ex = &child->parent->ex_dev;
+	bool print_topology_bug = false;
+	int res = 0;
+
+	switch (child->parent->dev_type) {
+	case SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE:
+		if (child->dev_type == SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE) {
+			if (parent_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING ||
+				child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) {
+				res = -ENODEV;
+				print_topology_bug = true;
+			}
+		} else if (parent_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) {
+			if (child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) {
+				res = sas_check_eeds(child, parent_phy, child_phy);
+			}

The "else if" below should not be on a different line.

Good catch. Will fix.

Thanks,
Jason


+			else if (child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) {
+				res = -ENODEV;
+				print_topology_bug = true;
[...]



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux