On 3/31/23 20:48, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 3/31/23 11:32, Tomas Henzl wrote: >> The patch doesn't fix a real bug so it isn't urgent nor important, >> seeing the congestion it creates please just drop it. > > Hi Tomas, > > I'm interested in failing future I/O from inside sd_shutdown() because > it would allow me to remove the I/O quiescing code from the UFS driver > shutdown callback. I'm aware of this, other drivers do have similar code and so it would help elsewhere as well. The patch as it is doesn't however ensure that there isn't for example an I/O started before sd.shutdown which may arrive in a driver after his shutdown has been called. Because of that I haven't used this as an argument in the discussion here. Regards, Tomas > > Thanks, > > Bart. >
