On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 12:46:05PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > I'm happy to take these via sysctl-next [0] but since > I don' think register_sysctl_table() will be nuked on v6.4 I think > it's fine for each of these to go into each respective tree. I can > pick up last stragglers on sysctl-next. If you want me to take this > via sysctl-next too, just let me know and I'm happy to do that. Either > way works. As I noted I've dropped the following already-picked-up patches from my queue: ipmi: simplify sysctl registration sgi-xp: simplify sysctl registration tty: simplify sysctl registration I've taken the rest now through sysctl-next: scsi: simplify sysctl registration with register_sysctl() hv: simplify sysctl registration md: simplify sysctl registration xen: simplify sysctl registration for balloon If a maintainer would prefer to take one on through their tree fine by me too, just let me know and I'll drop the patch. Luis
