On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:06:51AM +0800, Vernon Yang wrote: > After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask > optimizations"), the cpumask size is divided into three different case, > so fix comment of cpumask_xxx correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/cpumask.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h > index 8fbe76607965..248bdb1c50dc 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h > @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int cpumask_check(unsigned int cpu) > * cpumask_first - get the first cpu in a cpumask > * @srcp: the cpumask pointer > * > - * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set. > + * Returns >= small_cpumask_bits if no cpus set. There's no such thing like small_cpumask_bits. Here and everywhere, nr_cpu_ids must be used. Actually, before 596ff4a09b89 nr_cpumask_bits was deprecated, and it must be like that for all users even now. nr_cpumask_bits must be considered as internal cpumask parameter and never referenced outside of cpumask code. Thansk, Yury