Re: [PATCH 01/81] scsi: qla2xxx: Refer directly to the qla2xxx_driver_template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/23 05:10, John Garry wrote:
On 04/03/2023 00:29, Bart Van Assche wrote:
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
@@ -6395,8 +6395,8 @@ int qlt_add_target(struct qla_hw_data *ha, struct scsi_qla_host *base_vha)
          return -ENOMEM;
      }
-    if (!(base_vha->host->hostt->supported_mode & MODE_TARGET))
-        base_vha->host->hostt->supported_mode |= MODE_TARGET;
+    if (!(qla2xxx_driver_template.supported_mode & MODE_TARGET))
+        qla2xxx_driver_template.supported_mode |= MODE_TARGET;

So we're saying if that MODE_TARGET bit is not set, then set it. It would be neater to just always set it, right?

Apart from that, I will say that I haven't studied the driver in detail, but my impression is that we should just set this flag per-shost in base_vha->host.active_mode, and not the host template supported_mode member. Indeed, we don't even seem to be making this driver scsi_host_template as const in this series, which I thought was the aim (and I assume because of this).

Hi John,

If I have to repost this patch series I will implement this suggestion.

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux