> On 02/15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Why does UFS even have it's own common tracing instad of just relying > > on the core SCSI one, and even worse pokes into command set specifics > > which is a no-go for LLDDs. This code simply needs to go away instead > > of beeing "enhanced". > > I'm not sure how all the other vendors use the trace tho, at least to me, it's > quite useful when debugging any UFS-specific information such as group_id and > doorbell status along with the attached scsi command, in addition to the > accurate latency measurements. For us as well. Moreover, we are mainly using upiu tracing which is not available at scsi ML. Thanks, Avri
