On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 21:04 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > msleep_interruptible -> ssleep is a > > change with zero practical impact for this driver, > > eh, how do you figure? > > A signal can clearly cause the abort-related functions to delay far > shorter than the driver wishes. > > The msleep_interruptible() in arcmsr_wait_msgint_ready() probably isn't > fatal -- unless it's there to ensure the hardware isn't pounded -- but > again, a signal can cause a CPU-wasting busy loop that could last for > quite a while (in CPU terms). I didn't say the usage wasn't a bad example or couldn't cause problems in certain cases. I said "zero practical effect". This is because the two possible threads that enter these routines already have all user signals blocked. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
