Re: [PATCH-next v2 2/2] scsi: fix iscsi rescan fails to create block device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

在 2023/01/29 14:46, Greg KH 写道:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 09:13:55AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
Hi, Greg

在 2023/01/28 18:45, Greg KH 写道:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index cac7c902cf70..a22109cdb8ef 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -1535,9 +1535,7 @@ static void __scsi_remove_target(struct scsi_target *starget)
   		if (sdev->channel != starget->channel ||
   		    sdev->id != starget->id)
   			continue;
-		if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL ||
-		    sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_CANCEL ||
-		    !get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
+		if (!get_device_unless_zero(&sdev->sdev_gendev))

If sdev_gendev is 0 here, the object is gone and you are working with
memory that is already freed so something is _VERY_ wrong.

In fact, this patch will work:

In __scsi_remove_target(), 'host_lock' is held to protect iterating
siblings, and object will wait for this lock in
scsi_device_dev_release() to remove siblings. Hence sdev will not be
freed untill the lock is released.

Then you got lucky, as that is not how a reference counted object should
be working (i.e. the reference dropped to 0 and it still be kept alive.)

Please fix up the scsi logic here, don't abuse the reference count code.


Thanks for the reply, I agree that we should fix this in scsi layer.

Kuai




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux