On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 01:43:54PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > > On 12/30/22 01:59, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > > Hello there, > > > > > > This series contains misc libata improvements. > > > > > > These improvements were identified while developing support for Command > > > Duration Limits (CDL). All patches in this series (i.e. V1 of these > > > patches) were orignally sent out as part of the CDL series, found here: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/510732e0-7962-cf54-c22c-f1d7066895f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ > > > > > > However, as these improvements are completely unrelated to CDL, they can > > > be merged independently, and should not need to wait for other patches. > > > > Applied the series to for-6.3. Patch 1 had a small conflict that I fixed > > up. Thanks ! > > I had a look at the SHA1 for this patch in your tree, and it looks good. > > However, patches 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 7/7 seem to miss your chain sign-off. Is this perhaps because checkpatch complains if the same sign-off exists twice on the same patch? Not sure if this should be ignored or not... To me, it seems more important to keep a record of the chain, than to keep checkpatch happy, but I could be wrong here.. Kind regards, Niklas
