From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
initialization:
drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.
Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Martin,
This patch is to fix two compilation warnings introduced by my commit:
6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg").
Apologies for this.
---
drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
index 0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
enum dma_data_direction dir;
- struct scatterlist *sg_list;
+ struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
int rpmb_req_type;
- int sg_cnt;
+ int sg_cnt = 0;
int ret;
int data_len;
--
2.25.1
