Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Add hibernation callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21/22 09:12, Anjana Hari wrote:
Add hibernation call backs - freeze, restore and thaw.
Add the respective prototypes.

Signed-off-by: Anjana Hari <quic_ahari@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/ufs/ufshcd.h      |  6 +++
  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index bda61be5f035..c216a97dc1dd 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -9453,6 +9453,25 @@ static int ufshcd_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba)
/* enable the host irq as host controller would be active soon */
  	ufshcd_enable_irq(hba);
+
+	if (hba->restore) {
+		/* Configure UTRL and UTMRL base address registers */
+		ufshcd_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hba->utrdl_dma_addr),
+			      REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
+		ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utrdl_dma_addr),
+			      REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_LIST_BASE_H);
+		ufshcd_writel(hba, lower_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
+			      REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_LIST_BASE_L);
+		ufshcd_writel(hba, upper_32_bits(hba->utmrdl_dma_addr),
+			      REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_LIST_BASE_H);
+		/* Commit the registers */
+		mb();
+	}

The comment above the mb() call is wrong. No matter the type of a barrier, a barrier controls the order in which load, store and/or MMIO operations happen. A barrier does not "commit" register writes.

The comment above mb() should explain which load, store and/or MMIO accesses are ordered and also why the ordering is necessary.

+	/*
+	 * Ensure no runtime PM operations take
+	 * place in the hibernation and restore sequence
+	 * on successful freeze operation.
+	 */
+	if (!ret)
+		pm_runtime_disable(hba->dev);

I think the power management core already serializes system-wide power management state transitions and runtime power management and hence that the above code can be left out.

+	/*
+	 * Now any runtime PM operations can be
+	 * allowed on successful restore operation
+	 */
+	if (!ret)
+		pm_runtime_enable(hba->dev);

Same comment for the above code.

+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_system_restore);
+
+int ufshcd_system_thaw(struct device *dev)
+{
+
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ret = ufshcd_system_resume(dev);
+	if (!ret)
+		pm_runtime_enable(hba->dev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_system_thaw);

Also here, please remove the code related to runtime power management.

diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 5cf81dff60aa..dadb3c732be4 100644
--- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -978,6 +978,9 @@ struct ufs_hba {
  #endif
  	u32 luns_avail;
  	bool complete_put;
+
+	/* Distinguish between resume and restore */
+	bool restore;
  };

Please convert this member variable into a function argument. This probably will require adding an argument to existing functions.

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux