Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/12/2022 10:03, Xingui Yang wrote:
If the ATA device fell off, call sas_ata_device_link_abort() directly and
mark all outstanding QCs as failed and kick-off EH Immediately. This avoids
having to wait for block layer timeouts.

Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes to v1:
- Use dev_is_sata() to check ATA device type
  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
index d5bc1314c341..a12b65eb4a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static void sas_destruct_ports(struct asd_sas_port *port)
void sas_unregister_dev(struct asd_sas_port *port, struct domain_device *dev)
  {
+	if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state) && dev_is_sata(dev))
+		sas_ata_device_link_abort(dev, false);

Firstly, I think that there is a bug in sas_ata_device_link_abort() -> ata_link_abort() code in that the host lock in not grabbed, as the comment in ata_port_abort() mentions. Having said that, libsas had already some dodgy host locking usage - specifically dropping the lock for the queuing path (that's something else to be fixed up ... I think that is due to queue command CB calling task_done() in some cases), but I still think that sas_ata_device_link_abort() should be fixed (to grab the host lock).

Secondly, this just seems like a half solution to the age-old problem - that is, EH eventually kicking in only after 30 seconds when a disk is removed with active IO. I say half solution as SAS disks still have this issue for libsas. Can we instead push to try to solve both of them now?

There was a broad previous discussion on this:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/Ykqg0kr0F*2Fyzk2XW@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/__;JQ!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MwAZFXXIwuP0lv-kuUIJ0ekUiGBWlTBhU3oQjyOf_yuP1rHDJb8UKMzJjndXNQ-W1PQGJXzgc0bQUsHh4NGh21EOc50$

From that discussion, Hannes was doing some related prep work series, but I don't think it got completed.

Thanks,
John

+
  	if (!test_bit(SAS_DEV_DESTROY, &dev->state) &&
  	    !list_empty(&dev->disco_list_node)) {
  		/* this rphy never saw sas_rphy_add */




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux