>>> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 15.12.2022 um 08:06 in Nachricht <Y5rHX95Vvl1aLhbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 03:08:44PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote: >> When iSCSI initiator logged in target, the target attached none valid >> lun but lun0. lun0 is not an valid disk, while it would response >> inquiry command with PQ=1 and other general scsi commands like probe lun. >> The others luns of target is added/removed dynamicly. > > I can't find any special casing of LUN0 in RFC7144, can you clarify > where you think that treats LUN0 any differently than other transports? Actusally I have no idea, but as a user of FC SAN systems I can remember a case when a storage system had to present a dummy LUN0 to enable hosts to find other LUNs (while LUN0 was never actually used). Maybe the client code was imperfect, I don't know. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "open-iscsi" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to open-iscsi+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/Y5rHX95Vvl1aLhbp%40infradead.org > .
