On 2022/12/14 0:22, John Garry wrote:
On 13/12/2022 15:09, Jason Yan wrote:
Factor out sas_ata_add_dev() and put it in sas_ata.c since it is a sata
related interface. Also follow the standard coding style to define an
inline empty function when CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA is not enabled.
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Apart from comment, below:
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 54 +-------------------------
include/scsi/sas_ata.h | 9 +++++
3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
@@ -109,6 +111,13 @@ static inline int sas_discover_sata(struct
domain_device *dev)
pr_notice("ATA device seen but CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA=N so cannot
attach\n");
return -ENXIO;
}
+static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent,
struct ex_phy *phy,
+ struct domain_device *child, int phy_id)
+{
+ pr_notice("ATA device seen but CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA=N so cannot
add device, target proto 0x%x at %016llx:0x%x\n",
+ phy->attached_tproto, SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr), phy_id);
Do you really think that we need to add all this info, like
parent->sas_addr?
I did not want to change the functionality at the first time so I kept
these info printing.
Indeed, I think that we could make all these prints for
CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_ATA=N into a single global pr_notice_once(). That's just
my thoughts.
Yeah, makes sense. Let me have a try.
Thanks
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
#endif
#endif /* _SAS_ATA_H_ */
.
