On 2022/12/5 16:45, John Garry wrote:
On 04/12/2022 08:16, Jason Yan wrote:
There is a sas_get_ata_command_set() declaration above sas_get_ata_info()
to make it compile ok. However this function is defined in the same file
below. So move it up to save the declaration.
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Apart from comments, below:
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you John.
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
index f7439bf9cdc6..34009c330eb2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
@@ -239,7 +239,19 @@ static struct sas_internal
*dev_to_sas_internal(struct domain_device *dev)
return to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->core.shost->transportt);
}
-static int sas_get_ata_command_set(struct domain_device *dev);
+static int sas_get_ata_command_set(struct domain_device *dev)
+{
+ struct dev_to_host_fis *fis =
+ (struct dev_to_host_fis *) dev->frame_rcvd;
nit: I did not think that we add a whitespace before casting. And I
think that it would be neater if fis was assigned separately, avoiding
overflowing the line in this way.
Having said that, it does seem odd to cast from u8 [] to struct
dev_to_host_fis * and then back to (u8 *) in the ata_tf_from_fis() call,
below.
Yeah, odd. I'd prefer remove 'fis' and then do:
ata_tf_from_fis(dev->frame_rcvd, &tf).
Thanks,
Jason
