On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 05:08:10PM -0600, Andrew Halaney wrote: > dev_err() statements are better to use than pr_err(), so switch to > those. > > In a similar vein, the check on the dev_req_params pointer here is > not needed, the two places this function is called never pass in a > NULL pointer, so instead of using dev_err() there just remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Mani > --- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > index b1fcff1fad0c..4350c44a6fc7 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > @@ -680,12 +680,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, > struct ufs_dev_params ufs_qcom_cap; > int ret = 0; > > - if (!dev_req_params) { > - pr_err("%s: incoming dev_req_params is NULL\n", __func__); > - ret = -EINVAL; > - goto out; > - } > - > switch (status) { > case PRE_CHANGE: > ufshcd_init_pwr_dev_param(&ufs_qcom_cap); > @@ -709,7 +703,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_pwr_change_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, > dev_max_params, > dev_req_params); > if (ret) { > - pr_err("%s: failed to determine capabilities\n", > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to determine capabilities\n", > __func__); > goto out; > } > -- > 2.38.1 > -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்