Re: unexpected scsi timeout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vasily Averin wrote:
> Albert Lee wrote:
>>>> Vasily Averin wrote:
>>>>> I've noticed that some scsi commands for DVD-drive attached to pata_via
>>>>> successfully finishes without any delays but reports about TIMEOUT condition. It
>>>>> happens because of ATA_ERR bit is set in status register. As result for each
>>>>> command  Error Handler thread awakened, requests sense buffer and go to sleep again.
>>>> Need more info.  Please post boot dmesg and the result of 'lspci -nn'
>>>> and 'hdparm -I /dev/srX' and when such errors occur.
>> Your log looks ok. It's normal for TEST_UNIT_READY to return ATA_ERR when no disc
>> inside and libata EH triggered to request sense.
> 
> It's a bit strange for me, IMHO other scsi drivers requests sense buffer without
> EH thread assistance.
> Currently we know that ATA_ERR can be returned; it is not error, but one of
> expected responses. Why we cannot request sense without EH? I would like to
> understand is it implementation drawback or I missed something probably?

That was a design choice.  It's easier to implement that way.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux