Re: [PATCH 1/2][next] scsi: qla2xxx: Replace one-element array with DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 19/11/2022 à 09:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 09:44:02AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 19/11/2022 à 00:47, Gustavo A. R. Silva a écrit :
One-element arrays as fake flex arrays are deprecated and we are moving
towards adopting C99 flexible-array members, instead. So, replace
one-element array declaration in struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp, which is
ultimately being used inside a union:

drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h:
3240 struct ct_sns_gpnft_pkt {
3241         union {
3242                 struct ct_sns_req req;
3243                 struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp rsp;
3244         } p;
3245 };

Important to mention is that doing a build before/after this patch results
in no binary differences.

Hi,

even with the:

   		rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) +
-			((vha->hw->max_fibre_devices - 1) *
+			(vha->hw->max_fibre_devices *
   			    sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data));

change ?

Yep; that change compensates for the removal of the 1 in the declaration
of entries[].

The above piece of code is a common idiom to calculate the size for an
allocation when a one-element array is involved. In the original code
(vha->hw->max_fibre_devices - 1) compensates for the _extra_ size of one
element of type struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data in sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp).


Yes, I do agree, that the code is equivalent. I was surprised that a compiler was smart enough to generate the same binary code.

With gcc 11.3.0 (x86_64), I do get some differences when I do:
   make drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.o
   objdump -D  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.o > before.asm

   patch -p1 < patch.diff

   make drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.o
   objdump -D  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.o > after.asm

   diff -u before.asm after.asm

Mostly some slight ordering of instruction changes, but the binary are not the same.

CJ

--
Gustavo


CJ


This help us make progress towards globally enabling
-fstrict-flex-arrays=3 [1].

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/245
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/193
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/602902.html [1]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h | 4 ++--
   drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c  | 2 +-
   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
index a26a373be9da..1eea977ef426 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
@@ -3151,12 +3151,12 @@ struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp {
   		uint8_t vendor_unique;
   	};
   	/* Assume the largest number of targets for the union */
-	struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data {
+	DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data {
   		u8 control_byte;
   		u8 port_id[3];
   		u32 reserved;
   		u8 port_name[8];
-	} entries[1];
+	}, entries);
   };
   /* CT command response */
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c
index 64ab070b8716..69d3bc795f90 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c
@@ -4073,7 +4073,7 @@ int qla24xx_async_gpnft(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, u8 fc4_type, srb_t *sp)
   		sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.req_size = GPN_FT_REQ_SIZE;
   		rspsz = sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpnft_rsp) +
-			((vha->hw->max_fibre_devices - 1) *
+			(vha->hw->max_fibre_devices *
   			    sizeof(struct ct_sns_gpn_ft_data));
   		sp->u.iocb_cmd.u.ctarg.rsp = dma_alloc_coherent(&vha->hw->pdev->dev,






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux