Avri, Thanks for your suggetions and review On Wed, 2022-11-09 at 08:18 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: > > In UFS 4.0, it introduced advanced RPMB, which can significantly > > improve > > RPMB's command performance, enhancing its atomic operation. We > > don't > > know which implementation will please everyone, mark this advanced > > RPMB > > patch as RFC. Any suggestions to make the patch a master patch are > > welcome. > > Based on suggestions and feedback from Hannes Reinecke and Bart, we > > can > > use job_bsg->request and job_bsg->reply to pass EHS packets without > > changing > > the BSG V4 structure and BSG core. So we push RFC patch just to > > start > > Advanced RPMB mainlining > > I concur with this approach. > > The current limitations that the new spec imposes, > > e.g. putting confidential data in a construct that lives in the ufs- > driver, > > practically gives no other alternative but ufs-bsg. > > > > If no one else object, maybe you can leave out the rfc from the next > version. > > I will prepare next version, and address your all questions in the next version. thanks. Kind regards, Bean
