Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxx>, alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx, avri.altman@xxxxxxx, asutoshd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx, beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx, tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx, cang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daejun7.park@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:25:05 -0700
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20221022213650.626766-3-beanhuo@iokpp.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0

On 10/22/22 14:36, Bean Huo wrote:

+	u8 lun_qdepth = hba->nutrs;

How about changing this into hba->nutrs - 1 since one tag is reserved('reserved_slot')?


Thanks,

Bart.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()
  - From: Bean Huo

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/3] Changes for ufshcd.c
  - From: Bean Huo
- [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()
  - From: Bean Huo

Prev by Date: Re: [Bug] double ->queue_rq() because of timeout in ->queue_rq()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Revert "WB is only available on LUN #0 to #7"
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Cleanup ufshcd_slave_alloc()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux