RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bean,

> LUs with WB potential support are properly checked in ufshcd_wb_probe()
> before calling ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(), so remove this unnecessary
> if-checkup in ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun() to match its function definition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
> index f68ca33f6ac7..2457b005101a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h
> @@ -300,9 +300,6 @@ static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
>                  pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
>                  return false;
>          }
> -        /* WB is available only for the logical unit from 0 to 7 */
> -        if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)

Then, there is no requirement for "param_offset" argument.

Thanks,
Daejun





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux