On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 03:21:26PM +0800, Ten Gao wrote: > From: Ten Gao <ten.gao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > when there is no data transmission, ufs is unnecessary to encrypt. > We need to adjust scsi crypto relation. > > Signed-off-by: Ten Gao <ten.gao@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h | 10 ++++++---- > include/ufs/ufshci.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h > index 504cc841540b..5bc2a0cbdfa6 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h > @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr_crypto(struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u32 *dword_0, > u32 *dword_1, u32 *dword_3) > { > if (lrbp->crypto_key_slot >= 0) { > - *dword_0 |= UTP_REQ_DESC_CRYPTO_ENABLE_CMD; > - *dword_0 |= lrbp->crypto_key_slot; > - *dword_1 = lower_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num); > - *dword_3 = upper_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num); > + if ((*dword_0 & UTRD_DIRECTION) != UTP_NO_DATA_TRANSFER) { > + *dword_0 |= UTP_REQ_DESC_CRYPTO_ENABLE_CMD; > + *dword_0 |= lrbp->crypto_key_slot; > + *dword_1 = lower_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num); > + *dword_3 = upper_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num); > + } > } > } This is very dangerous, as it will silently skip en/decryption. Why was a keyslot assigned in the first place if the I/O doesn't need en/decryption? - Eric