On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 03:21:26PM +0800, Ten Gao wrote:
> From: Ten Gao <ten.gao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> when there is no data transmission, ufs is unnecessary to encrypt.
> We need to adjust scsi crypto relation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ten Gao <ten.gao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h | 10 ++++++----
> include/ufs/ufshci.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h
> index 504cc841540b..5bc2a0cbdfa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-crypto.h
> @@ -30,10 +30,12 @@ ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr_crypto(struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp, u32 *dword_0,
> u32 *dword_1, u32 *dword_3)
> {
> if (lrbp->crypto_key_slot >= 0) {
> - *dword_0 |= UTP_REQ_DESC_CRYPTO_ENABLE_CMD;
> - *dword_0 |= lrbp->crypto_key_slot;
> - *dword_1 = lower_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num);
> - *dword_3 = upper_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num);
> + if ((*dword_0 & UTRD_DIRECTION) != UTP_NO_DATA_TRANSFER) {
> + *dword_0 |= UTP_REQ_DESC_CRYPTO_ENABLE_CMD;
> + *dword_0 |= lrbp->crypto_key_slot;
> + *dword_1 = lower_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num);
> + *dword_3 = upper_32_bits(lrbp->data_unit_num);
> + }
> }
> }
This is very dangerous, as it will silently skip en/decryption. Why was a
keyslot assigned in the first place if the I/O doesn't need en/decryption?
- Eric
