https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215880 --- Comment #41 from Damien Le Moal (damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx) --- (In reply to jason600 from comment #40) > I have been using Damien Lemoal's patch for the last couple of days on > kernel 5.19.8, it works fine for me, and no obvious issues. > > I also tried in on kernel 6.0, again works fine and no obvious issues. > > (In reply to damien.lemoal from comment #39) > > I am not sure at all this is correct though. This actually may break other > > suspend/resume flavors. If we could somehow synchronize scsi pm resume to > > run *after* ata pm resume, all problems should go away I think. > > With regard to Damiens comments, and the problems with this patch last time > it was submitted, I think it would be a good idea to have more people > testing this patch before re-submitting it. I did not submit that patch on the lists, because I am not convinced this is the right approach. It is a "hack" right now. As mentioned, the problem is that scsi and ata pm resume are running at the same time because the dev/pm code does not seem to know the dependency between the devices (struct dev). Would need to dig further into that first to see if a cleaner solution can be coded. Will try, but busy, so it may take some time. I first need to be able to recreate the issue on my systems. Will start with that :) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
